The Female Body Is Not Standardized: Why AI Must Catch Up

Authors

  • Simran Singh Author

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, modern healthcare, diagnostic imaging, predictive analytics, AI models, decision-making

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly positioned as a transformative force in modern healthcare. From diagnostic imaging and predictive analytics to personalized treatment recommendations, AI-driven systems promise efficiency, accuracy, and scalability. However, underneath this guise of technological progress, the problem of treating the male anatomy as standard in healthcare continues to pose a challenge. 

   This paper explores how AI in healthcare reinforces historical patterns of gender bias by excluding women from medical datasets and male-centered model design. It discusses the negative impacts of deploying male-standardized AI systems in women's health and calls for the development of women-centered AI. The authors’ recommendations include the use of diverse clinical data, creating algorithms suitable for female physiology, and setting up ethical oversight to achieve equity and accuracy in healthcare in the age of AI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Biddle C, et al. Gender differences in symptom misattribution for coronary heart disease symptoms and intentions to seek health care. Women Health. 2020;60(4):367-381.

2. Chinta SV, et al. AI-driven healthcare: fairness in AI healthcare: a survey. PLOS Digit Health. 2025;4(5):e0000864

3. Chinta SV, et al. AI-driven healthcare: fairness in AI healthcare: a survey. PLOS Digit Health. 2025;4(5):e0000864

4. Harrilal-Maharaj K. Gender bias and diagnostic delays in young women: a narrative review. Cureus. 2025;17(12):e100004.

5. Larrazabal AJ, Nieto N, Peterson V, Milone DH, Ferrante E. Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(23):12592-12594.

6. Liu M, Ning Y, Teixayavong S, et al. A scoping review and evidence gap analysis of clinical AI fairness. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:360.

7. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Women’s health research: progress, pitfalls, and promise. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2010.

8. Skogli EW, Teicher MH, Andersen PN, et al. ADHD in girls and boys - gender differences in co-existing symptoms and executive function measures. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:298.

9. Seyyed-Kalantari L, Zhang H, McDermott MBA, et al. Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations. Nat Med. 2021;27:2176-2182.

10. Straw I, Wu H. Investigating for bias in healthcare algorithms: a sex-stratified analysis of supervised machine learning models in liver disease prediction. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022;29(1):e100457.

11. Gender bias revealed in AI tools screening for liver disease. UCL News. 2022 Jul 11. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2022/jul/gender-bias-revealed-ai-tools-screening-liver-disease.

12. Zhang L, Reynolds Losin EA, Ashar YK, Koban L, Wager TD. Gender biases in estimation of others’ pain. Pain. 2021;22(9):1048-1059.

Published

28-02-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Female Body Is Not Standardized: Why AI Must Catch Up. (2026). Virosa Journal of AI in Science and Healthcare, 1(1), 1-6. https://virosapub.com/index.php/vjash/article/view/12

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.